expand on singe-item caches
This commit is contained in:
parent
7a62bf2351
commit
639e13fb8f
@ -315,10 +315,14 @@ Ideas for augmenting your data structure:
|
||||
|
||||
* Over the wire, the network + cost of serialization will hurt.
|
||||
* In-process caches, but now you need to worry about expiration and added GC pressure
|
||||
* Even a single item can help (logfile time parse example).
|
||||
|
||||
TODO: "cache" might not even be key-value, just a pointer to where you were
|
||||
working. This can be as simple as a "search finger"
|
||||
A cache saves information you've just spent time computing in the hopes that
|
||||
you'll be able to reuse it again soon and save the computation time. A cache
|
||||
doesn't need to be complex. Even storing a single item -- the most recently
|
||||
seen query/response -- can be a big win. This "single item" idea can be extended
|
||||
to a "search finger", where you store an pointer to where your just were in your
|
||||
data structure on the assumption it's a good starting point for your next
|
||||
operation.
|
||||
|
||||
These are all clear examples of "do less work" at the data structure level.
|
||||
They all cost space. Most of the time if you're optimizing for CPU, your
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user